Evaluation of the Context of Completion of Follow-up Actions on Supervision Results in North Gorontalo Regency

Authors

  • Frenky Reymond Jantu Universitas Negeri Gorontalo
  • Asna Aneta Universitas Negeri Gorontalo
  • Udin Hamin Universitas Negeri Gorontalo

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47616/jamrsss.v7i1.694

Keywords:

Follow-Up of Supervision Results, Policy Evaluation, CIPP Model, Regional Inspectorate, Local Governance

Abstract

This study examines the implementation of the Follow-Up of Supervision Results policy (TLHP) in North Gorontalo Regency within the framework of bureaucratic reform and good governance. Effective follow-up of audit recommendations is essential to ensure accountability, prevent corruption, and improve public sector performance. The research aims to evaluate the policy context, particularly the adequacy of the legal basis, the clarity of objectives and targets, and the alignment of programs and activities supporting TLHP completion. A mixed-methods approach with an exploratory sequential design was employed. Qualitative data were collected through observation, in-depth interviews, and document analysis, then strengthened by quantitative weighting using the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP). The evaluation framework applied the CIPP model developed by Stufflebeam. The findings reveal that policy objectives and targets have been clearly formulated in the Inspectorate’s planning documents and meet SMART criteria. However, major constraints remain in the regulatory and institutional aspects. There is no comprehensive derivative regional regulation, particularly concerning recovery of losses involving third parties. Moreover, most regional apparatus organizations do not integrate TLHP into their performance targets due to budget limitations and sectoral ego, causing weak cross-agency commitment. Strengthening local regulations, establishing supporting institutions, and integrating TLHP into all agencies’ planning documents are crucial to improving effectiveness.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Akinsola, K. (2025). Legal Oversight of State-Owned Enterprises: Governance Structures, Compliance, and Public Accountability. Compliance, and Public Accountability (February 07, 2025). https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5128102

Asmony, Thatok. 2015. Penelitian Kualitatif: Pendekatan Studi Kasus. Mataram: University Press.

Bakhtiyarovich, M. F. (2025). Governance And Oversight Of State Corporations: Balancing Control And Autonomy. Scientific Journal of Actuarial Finance and Accounting, 5(05), 62-71. https://doi.org/10.55439/AFA/vol5_iss05/977

Creswell, John W. 2010. Research Design: Pendekatan Kualitatif, Kuantitatif, dan Mixed. Penerjemah: Achmad Fawaid. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Janda, S. N., & Masango, R. S. (2024). Oversight Function and Accountability as Cornerstones for Good Governance in the South African Local Government. Journal of Public Administration, 59(1), 87-101. https://doi.org/10.53973/jopa.2024.59.1.a8

Jones, L. R., & Kettl, D. F. (2004). Assessing public management reform strategy in an international context. In Strategies for public management reform (pp. 453-473). Emerald Group Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0723-1318(04)13018-1

Kurniawati, W. O. I., & Saprudin, S. (2025). Ethics in Indonesian Government Bureaucracy: Theoretical Foundations, Historical Evolution, and Contemporary Case Studies. Journal of Asian Multicultural Research for Social Sciences Study, 6(1), 21-29. https://doi.org/10.47616/jamrsss.v6i1.588

Labolo, M., & Indrayani, E. (2017). Bureaucratic reform and the challenge of good governance implementation in Indonesia. Journal Of Asian Review Of Public Affair And Policy, 2(4), 25-47.

Larbi, G. A. (1999). The new public management approach and crisis states. Switzerland: United Nations Research Institute

Lewis, P. (2008). Poverty, inequality, and democracy: Growth without prosperity in Africa. Journal of Democracy, 19(4), 95-109. https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.0.0041

Naibaho, R. E. I. (2017). Evaluation of Bureaucracy Reform Program at State Personnel Agency. IJHCM (International Journal of Human Capital Management), 1(02), 136-145. https://doi.org/10.21009/IJHCM.01.02.15

Ogrinc, G., Mooney, S. E., Estrada, C., Foster, T., Goldmann, D., Hall, L. W., ... & Watts, B. (2008). The SQUIRE (Standards for QUality Improvement Reporting Excellence) guidelines for quality improvement reporting: explanation and elaboration. BMJ Quality & Safety, 17(Suppl 1), i13-i32. https://doi.org/10.1136/qshc.2008.029058

Rakasiwi, G. (2021, January). Bureaucratic Reform in the Field of Human Resources Apparatus as the Main Capital in Realizing Good Governance. In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Indonesian Social and Political Enquiries, ICISPE 2020, 9-10 October 2020, Semarang, Indonesia. https://doi.org/10.4108/eai.9-10-2020.2304769

Sugiyono. (2017). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Penerbit Alfabeta

Thomas, G. W. (2012). Governance, good governance, and global governance: conceptual and actual challenges. In Thinking about global governance (pp. 168-189). London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203807057

Zhang, H. (2023). People's Well-Rounded Development: The Value Orientation of Common Prosperity in the New Era. J. Hum. Rts., 22, 558.

Downloads

Published

2026-03-15

How to Cite

Jantu, F. R., Aneta, A. ., & Hamin, U. . (2026). Evaluation of the Context of Completion of Follow-up Actions on Supervision Results in North Gorontalo Regency. Journal of Asian Multicultural Research for Social Sciences Study, 7(1), 10-25. https://doi.org/10.47616/jamrsss.v7i1.694