The Effects of Criminal Evidence Obtained Illegally

Ismail Aghababaei Bani; Jabr Khalaf Issa Al-Maliki

doi:10.47616/jamrsss.v4i1.371

Authors

Ismail Aghababaei Bani Member of the faculty and researchers, Higher Institute of Islamic Sciences and Culture, Institute of Jurisprudence and Law, Department of Jurisprudence and Legal Affairs, Islamic Republic of Iran
Jabr Khalaf Issa Al-Maliki University of Misan, Iraq

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47616/jamrsss.v4i1.371

Keywords:

Authoritative Evidence, Constitutional Protection, Legitimate Evidence, The Authority Of The Judge, The Effects Of The Evidence, The Accused

Abstract

The effects of illegal criminal evidence and its role in the procedures and their impact on the accused to know the authenticity of the criminal evidence obtained illegally. In addition, it supports all legal professionals, and resulting from the criminal investigation and scientific and technological developments in the modern era. The importance of modern forensic evidence in this field has increased with the scientific development and technology and the use of various rapid developments in modern scientific ways to try to get rid of crimes that are difficult for the old methods to detect. The justice apparatus needs legal and scientific basis to supports criminal evidence so that it is fair in front of everyone and far from misleading. The effects of illegal criminal evidence must be dealt with by setting laws that keep pace with modern developments and banishing illegal evidence in order to rid the innocent accused of the crimes against you without legitimate evidence.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abdul Rahman Khalfi, Lectures on the Code of Criminal Procedures, p. 72.

Berman, G., & Feinblatt, J. (2015). Good courts: The case for problem-solving justice (Vol. 8). Quid Pro Books.

Feeley, M. M. (1979). The process is the punishment: Handling cases in a lower criminal court. Russell Sage Foundation.

Julien, R. M. (2013). A primer of drug action: A concise nontechnical guide to the actions, uses, and side effects of psychoactive drugs, revised and updated. Holt Paperbacks.

Kahn, D. S. (2010). Presumed guilty until proven innocent: The burden of proof in wrongful conviction claims under state compensation statutes. U. Mich. JL Reform, 44, 123.

Leo, R. A., & Ofshe, R. J. (1997). Consequences of false confessions: Deprivations of liberty and miscarriages of justice in the age of psychological interrogation. J. Crim. l. & Criminology, 88, 429.

Muhammad Amin Al-Harsha, The Legality of Sound and Image in Criminal Evidence, pg. 121, 10

Munir Riad Hanna, Forensic Medicine and the Scientific and Police Methods Used in Detecting Crimes and Tracking Offenders, p. 262.

Munir Riyad Henna, Forensic Medicine and the Scientific and Police Methods Used in Detecting Crimes and Punishing Paradise, p. 205.

Strauss, P. L. (2012). Deference" Is Too Confusing—Let's Call Them" Chevron Space" And" Skidmore Weight. Columbia Law Review, 1143-1173.

Uchida, C. D. (1993). The development of the American police: An historical overview. Critical issues in policing: Contemporary readings, 3, 19-35.

Warltier, D. C., Howard, S. K., Rosekind, M. R., Katz, J. D., & Berry, A. J. (2002). Fatigue in anesthesia: implications and strategies for patient and provider safety. The Journal of the American Society of Anesthesiologists, 97(5), 1281-1294.

Wilkinson, S. (2004). Bodies for sale: Ethics and exploitation in the human body trade. Routledge.