Ethics in Indonesian Government Bureaucracy: Theoretical Foundations, Historical Evolution, and Contemporary Case Studies

Authors

  • Wa Ode Intan Kurniawati Southeast Sulawesi University, Indonesia
  • Saprudin Saprudin Southeast Sulawesi University, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47616/jamrsss.v6i1.588

Keywords:

Bureaucratic Ethics, Good Governance, Corruption

Abstract

Bureaucratic ethics play a crucial role in ensuring good governance, accountability, and public trust in government institutions. In Indonesia, bureaucratic ethics have evolved through various historical phases, including the traditional patrimonial system, Dutch colonial administration, post-independence governance, the New Order regime, and the Reform Era. Despite efforts to strengthen bureaucratic integrity, challenges such as corruption, nepotism, inefficiency, and political interference persist, undermining public service effectiveness. This study examines the historical evolution of bureaucratic ethics in Indonesia, the ethical challenges faced by the bureaucracy, and the reform strategies implemented to enhance good governance. The findings indicate that while Indonesia has introduced legal and institutional measures, such as Law No. 5 of 2014 on State Civil Apparatus and the establishment of the Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK), enforcement gaps and political resistance continue to hinder ethical governance. Additionally, e-Government initiatives and citizen participation mechanisms have been introduced to improve transparency and accountability, yet bureaucratic resistance and technological limitations pose challenges to their implementation. Strengthening bureaucratic ethics requires a multi-faceted approach, including stronger enforcement of anti-corruption laws, the promotion of merit-based recruitment, increased public engagement, and ongoing digital transformation. This study concludes that while bureaucratic reforms have contributed to some improvements, sustained efforts in governance reform, institutional strengthening, and ethical leadership are necessary to build a transparent, efficient, and accountable bureaucratic system in Indonesia.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ariani, S. A. F., & Prasetyoningsih, N. (2022). Fighting Corruption Post Revision of the Act of the Corruption Eradication Commission. Media of Law and Sharia, 3(3), 235-254.

Azelmad, S. (2024). eGovernment Whole-of-Government Approach for Good Governance: The Back-Office Integrated Management IT Systems. CRC Press.

Bade, Z. A. (2024). Dialectics of Traditional Authority and Post-Colonial Modern State: The Case of Somaliland. European Journal of Theoretical and Applied Sciences, 2(1), 468-479.

Bernstein, A., & Rodríguez, C. (2023). The accountable bureaucrat. YALE LJ, 132, 1600.

Bourguignon, F., & Platteau, J. P. (2023). A Patrimonial Regime with Multiple Oligarchs. State Capture and Rent-Seeking in Benin: The Institutional Diagnostic Project, 349.

Fauzi, A., Sukaesih, R., Sauri, S., & Handayani, S. (2022). Public Trust, Ethic and Integrity in the Bureaucracy. PPSDP International Journal of Education, 1(2), 196-202.

Gruber, J. (2023). Controlling bureaucracies: Dilemmas in democratic governance. Univ of California Press.

Hidayat, F. (2023). The Impact Of Bureaucratic Reform On Indonesian Governance: A Perspective Review Of Academic Literature. Jurnal Politik Pemerintahan Dharma Praja, 16(2), 169-196.

Mendy, O. (2023). Ethics and accountability in government bureaucracy. Pancasila and Law Review, 4(2), 107-116.

Sabani, A. (2021). Investigating the influence of transparency on the adoption of e-Government in Indonesia. Journal of Science and Technology Policy Management, 12(2), 236-255.

Saha, S., & Sen, K. (2021). The corruption–growth relationship: does the political regime matter?. Journal of Institutional Economics, 17(2), 243-266.

Singleton-Green, B. (2022). Why has monarchy been so successful?. Available at SSRN 3747057.

Suprayitno, N. F., & Abbas, S. A. (2024). Bureaucratic Transformation in Indonesia: An In-Depth Analysis from the Perspective of Public Administration. Mandat: Journal of Politics, Government, and Public Administration, 1(1), 34-51.

Svara, J. H. (2021). The ethics primer for public administrators in government and nonprofit organizations. Jones & Bartlett Learning.

Turner, M., Prasojo, E., & Sumarwono, R. (2022). The challenge of reforming big bureaucracy in Indonesia. Policy Studies, 43(2), 333-351.

Downloads

Published

2025-03-13

How to Cite

Kurniawati, W. O. I., & Saprudin, S. (2025). Ethics in Indonesian Government Bureaucracy: Theoretical Foundations, Historical Evolution, and Contemporary Case Studies. Journal of Asian Multicultural Research for Social Sciences Study, 6(1), 21-29. https://doi.org/10.47616/jamrsss.v6i1.588