The oligarchic tendencies lead to the social movements of the Industrial Trends: Global Point of View

Authors

  • Martin Elies University of St. La Salle, Philippines

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47616/jamrsss.v3i1.268

Keywords:

Marginal Groups, Social Economy, Communities

Abstract

The article discusses oligarchy and Egalitarian social movement, Poverty, Increasing Deprivation, and Egalitarian Movement the discussion contains oligarchy tendency, in order to trace the general effects of industrial trends, deviations from the previous Commercial Revolution are necessary as they mark the origins of the nation-state and trends. The industrialization and revolution. Oligarchy, Ideology, and the Emergence of Political Parties.  Industrial trends resulted in a necessary but repressive division of the workforce and created a wage-dependent working class in urban environments. The English Revolution of the seventeenth century and the American and French Revolutions of the eighteenth century the bourgeois revolution with a political doctrine based on the natural rights of life, liberty. property, revolution, and popular sovereignty

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ando, C. (2000). Imperial ideology and provincial loyalty in the Roman Empire. University of California Press.

Deakin, S. (2013). Addressing labour market segmentation: The role of labour law. Cambridge: Centre for Business Research, University of Cambridge.

Edmonstone, J. (2016). Complex adaptive leadership: embracing paradox and uncertainty.

Hudson, P. (2014). The industrial revolution. Bloomsbury Publishing.

Iversen, T. (2001). 2 The Dynamics of Welfare State Expansion: Trade Openness, De-industrialization, and Partisan Politics 10. The new politics of the welfare state, 45.

McGaughey, E. (2017). Democracy or Oligarchy? Models of Union Governance in the UK, Germany and US. Models of Union Governance in the UK, Germany and US (June 29, 2017). King's College London Law School Research Paper, (2017-35).

Obolensky, M. N. (2014). Complex adaptive leadership: Embracing paradox and uncertainty. Gower Publishing, Ltd..

Ormrod, D., & David, O. (2003). The rise of commercial empires: England and the Netherlands in the age of mercantilism, 1650-1770 (Vol. 10). Cambridge University Press.

Pincus, S. (2012). Rethinking mercantilism: political economy, the British empire, and the Atlantic world in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries. The William and Mary Quarterly, 69(1), 3-34.

Rodan, G. (2016). The political economy of Singapore's industrialization: national state and international capital. Springer.

Rule, J. (2014). The labouring classes in early industrial England, 1750-1850. Routledge.

Takim, L. N. (2012). The heirs of the prophet: charisma and religious authority in Shi'ite Islam. SUNY Press.

Trigg, J. W. (1981). The Charismatic Intellectual: Origen's Understanding of Religious Leadership. Church History, 50(1), 5-19

Downloads

Published

2022-04-01

How to Cite

Elies, M. (2022). The oligarchic tendencies lead to the social movements of the Industrial Trends: Global Point of View. Journal of Asian Multicultural Research for Social Sciences Study, 3(1), 50-56. https://doi.org/10.47616/jamrsss.v3i1.268