Comparison of Modern and Conventional Learning Methods for Children with Special Needs
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
Sažetak
When it comes to education, conventional and modern ways of learning are applied at all times. This, however, applies to students with special needs in order to meet their individual learning objectives. Based on the needs of students and the resources available in each region, conventional and new learning methods are used. Conventional and modern learning techniques will produce learning methods that are tactical, technical, and practical in the form of expository methods, demonstrations, panel discussion and debate, role-playing, and simulation techniques. A modern and traditional learning method's efficacy, efficiency, and quality can be measured by these three factors.
##plugins.generic.usageStats.downloads##
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##
##submission.citations##
Deslauriers, L., McCarty, L. S., Miller, K., Callaghan, K., & Kestin, G. (2019). Measuring actual learning versus feeling of learning in response to being actively engaged in the classroom. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 116(39), 19251-19257.
Harris, J., Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. (2009). Teachers’ technological pedagogical content knowledge and learning activity types: Curriculum-based technology integration reframed. Journal of research on technology in education, 41(4), 393-416.
Irwanto, I. (2021). Comparison Of Mobile Learning Based Learning Models With Conventional In Improving Students'learning Outcomes. Jurnal Pendidikan Teknologi Informasi dan Vokasional, 3(1).
Kayes, D. C. (2002). Experiential learning and its critics: Preserving the role of experience in management learning and education. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 1(2), 137-149.
Nasreen, S. (2014). Learning style preferences of junior school students in Bangladesh (Doctoral dissertation, BRAC University).
Piercy, M., Wilton, K., & Townsend, M. (2002). Promoting the social acceptance of young children with moderate–severe intellectual disabilities using cooperative-learning techniques. American journal on mental retardation, 107(5), 352-360.
Saavedra, A. R., & Opfer, V. D. (2012). Learning 21st-century skills requires 21st-century teaching. Phi Delta Kappan, 94(2), 8-13.
Schunk, D. H., & Greene, J. A. (2017). Historical, contemporary, and future perspectives on self-regulated learning and performance (pp. 1-15). Routledge.
Vlachopoulos, D., & Makri, A. (2019). Online communication and interaction in distance higher education: A framework study of good practice. International Review of Education, 65(4), 605-632.
Ziegler, A., Chandler, K. L., Vialle, W., & Stoeger, H. (2017). Exogenous and endogenous learning resources in the Actiotope Model of Giftedness and its significance for gifted education. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 40(4), 310-333.