Evaluation of Academic Quality Assurance Program at Sultan AMAI State Islamic Institute Gorontalo
Barra lateral del artículo
Contenido principal del artículo
Resumen
This study aims to determine the evaluation of the academic quality assurance program at the Sultan AMAI State Islamic Institute of Gorontalo. The method used in this research is the descriptive method with the CIPP model (Context, Input, Process, Product). Data collection techniques used were observation, interviews, and documentation. The results showed a lack of alumni readiness to enter the business and professional world so that there were some alumni from one of the departments who had a long waiting period; There are still many departments/study programs that are accredited C. There is still a lack of professional staff in the field of research and community service; There is still a lack of research and community service involving students; Lack of application/transfer of technology as a result of community service with community needs; Internal service programs were still dominant; The community service partnership network has not been maximized; Not yet well-coordinated the target areas/villages; Weak monitoring and evaluation of community service programs, so that it cannot be ascertained that its implementation is in accordance with the scientific field.
Descargas
Detalles del artículo
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-CompartirIgual 4.0.
Citas
Algarabel, S., & Dasi, C. (2001). The definition of achievement and the construction of tests for its measurement: A review of the main trends. Psicologica, 22(1), 43-66.
Battini, M., Vieira, A., Barbieri, S., Ajuda, I., Stilwell, G., & Mattiello, S. (2014). Invited review: Animal-based indicators for on-farm welfare assessment for dairy goats. Journal of dairy science, 97(11), 6625-6648.
Belawati, T., & Zuhairi, A. (2007). The practice of a quality assurance system in open and distance learning: A case study at Universitas Terbuka Indonesia (The Indonesia Open University). The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 8(1).
Biggs, J. (2001). The reflective institution: Assuring and enhancing the quality of teaching and learning. Higher education, 41(3), 221-238.
Kafid, N., & Rohmatika, A. (2020). Academic social capital and institutional transformation of Islamic higher education in Indonesia. Akademika: Jurnal Pemikiran Islam, 24(2), 335-352.
Klefsjö, B., Bergquist, B., & Garvare, R. (2008). Quality management and business excellence, customers and stakeholders: do we agree on what we are talking about, and does it matter?. The TQM Journal, 20(2), 120-129.
Robinson, C. J., & Malhotra, M. K. (2005). Defining the concept of supply chain quality management and its relevance to academic and industrial practice. International Journal of Production Economics, 96(3), 315-337.
Rowlands, J. (2012). Accountability, quality assurance and performativity: The changing role of the academic board. Quality in Higher Education, 18(1), 97-110.
Sadler, D. R. (2005). Interpretations of criteria‐based assessment and grading in higher education. Assessment & evaluation in higher education, 30(2), 175-194.
Stufflebeam, D. L. (1980). Interview: An EEPA Interview with Daniel L. Stufflebeam. Educational evaluation and policy analysis, 2(4), 85-90.
Yi, B., Viens, F., Li, Z., & Zeng, Y. (2015). Robust optimal strategies for an insurer with reinsurance and investment under benchmark and mean-variance criteria. Scandinavian Actuarial Journal, 2015(8), 725-751.
Zhang, G., Zeller, N., Griffith, R., Metcalf, D., Williams, J., Shea, C., & Misulis, K. (2011). Using the context, input, process, and product evaluation model (CIPP) as a comprehensive framework to guide the planning, implementation, and assessment of service-learning programs. Journal of Higher Education Outreach and Engagement, 15(4), 57-84.