Harnessing the Power of Smart Devices for On-the-Go Education
Barre latérale de l'article
Contenu principal de l'article
Résumé
This take a look at explores the dynamics of on-the-go education facilitated by means of smart devices, specializing in participant demographics, clever device utilization patterns, alternatives for academic apps, and perceptions of advantages and challenges. A numerous sample of 300 participants spanning diverse instructional ranges and genders engaged in a quantitative survey. Descriptive information discovered that clever gadgets are regularly used for training, with E-Books being the most favored app category. Participants recounted the advantages of flexibility and accessibility, but highlighted restrained peer interplay as a challenge. These findings underscore the need for innovative approaches to decorate collaboration in on-the-pass schooling. The have a look at's implications inform educators, designers, and technologists in adapting practices for the evolving needs of modern inexperienced persons.
Téléchargements
Renseignements sur l'article
Cette œuvre est protégée sous licence Creative Commons Attribution - Partage dans les Mêmes Conditions 4.0 International.
Références
Alshahrani, A. (2023). The impact of ChatGPT on blended learning: Current trends and future research directions. International Journal of Data and Network Science, 7(4), 2029-2040.
Bernacki, M. L., Greene, J. A., & Crompton, H. (2020). Mobile technology, learning, and achievement: Advances in understanding and measuring the role of mobile technology in education. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 60, 101827.
Cai, Y., Pan, Z., & Liu, M. (2022). Augmented reality technology in language learning: A meta‐analysis. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 38(4), 929-945.
Cejudo, J., Losada, L., & Feltrero, R. (2020). Promoting social and emotional learning and subjective well-being: Impact of the “aislados” intervention program in adolescents. International journal of environmental research and public health, 17(2), 609.
Falloon, G. (2020). From digital literacy to digital competence: the teacher digital competency (TDC) framework. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68, 2449-2472.
Hoi, V. N. (2020). Understanding higher education learners' acceptance and use of mobile devices for language learning: A Rasch-based path modeling approach. Computers & Education, 146, 103761.
Mack, K., McDonnell, E., Potluri, V., Xu, M., Zabala, J., Bigham, J., ... & Bennett, C. (2022, April). Anticipate and adjust: Cultivating access in human-centered methods. In Proceedings of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1-18).
Małek, Ł. A., Marczak, M., Miłosz‐Wieczorek, B., Konopka, M., Braksator, W., Drygas, W., & Krzywański, J. (2021). Cardiac involvement in consecutive elite athletes recovered from Covid‐19: A magnetic resonance study. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 53(6), 1723-1729.
Muthuprasad, T., Aiswarya, S., Aditya, K. S., & Jha, G. K. (2021). Students’ perception and preference for online education in India during COVID-19 pandemic. Social sciences & humanities open, 3(1), 100101.
Shore, L. M., & Chung, B. G. (2022). Inclusive leadership: How leaders sustain or discourage work group inclusion. Group & Organization Management, 47(4), 723-754.
Tabuenca, B., Serrano-Iglesias, S., Martin, A. C., Villa-Torrano, C., Dimitriadis, Y., Asensio-Pérez, J. I., ... & Kloos, C. D. (2021). Affordances and core functions of smart learning environments: A systematic literature review. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 14(2), 129-145.
Yıldırım, M., & Güler, A. (2022). Factor analysis of the COVID-19 perceived risk scale: A preliminary study. Death studies, 46(5), 1065-1072.