Main Article Content
The discovery learning paradigm, which is discussed in this article, is one that is well-suited to the task of teaching students how to detect observation results when they are presented in written form. The students in this method acquire knowledge by hands-on experience, which encourages both their individual initiative and their individual originality as learners. Discovery When a teacher employs the learning approach, also known as the discovery method, they instruct in such a way that children are exposed to new material that they were previously unaware of. Students engage in activities or learning that involve discovery learning, also known as discovery learning, in order to uncover concepts and principles through their own internal mental processes. Students are required to conduct observations, categorize information, form hypotheses, explain their reasoning, and draw conclusions as part of the process of finding concepts or principles. The improvement of students' English proficiency is the focus of this article, which takes a discovery learning strategy to achieve that goal.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Allais, S. (2012). Claims vs. practicalities: lessons about using learning outcomes. Journal of Education and Work, 25(3), 331-354.
Hirsh, D. A., Ogur, B., Thibault, G. E., & Cox, M. (2007). "Continuity" as an organizing principle for clinical education reform. New England Journal of Medicine, 356(8), 858.
Hung, H. T. (2015). Flipping the classroom for English language learners to foster active learning. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 28(1), 81-96.
Jones, B. D. (2009). Motivating students to engage in learning: the MUSIC model of academic motivation. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 21(2), 272-285.
Kennedy, D. (2006). Writing and using learning outcomes: a practical guide. University College Cork.
Korthagen, F., Loughran, J., & Russell, T. (2006). Developing fundamental principles for teacher education programs and practices. Teaching and teacher education, 22(8), 1020-1041.
Lampe, C., Wohn, D. Y., Vitak, J., Ellison, N. B., & Wash, R. (2011). Student use of Facebook for organizing collaborative classroom activities. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 6(3), 329-347.
Malmia, W., Makatita, S. H., Lisaholit, S., Azwan, A., Magfirah, I., Tinggapi, H., & Umanailo, M. C. B. (2019). Problem-based learning as an effort to improve student learning outcomes. Int. J. Sci. Technol. Res, 8(9), 1140-1143.
Mufida, H. N., Linuwih, S., & Sugianto, S. (2019). Descriptive Analysis of Student’s Self Efficacy in The Discovery Learning Processes. Physics Communication, 3(1), 41-46.
Pedaste, M., Mäeots, M., Siiman, L. A., De Jong, T., Van Riesen, S. A., Kamp, E. T.,& Tsourlidaki, E. (2015). Phases of inquiry-based learning: Definitions and the inquiry cycle. Educational research review, 14, 47-61.
Ruiz‐Primo, M. A., & Furtak, E. M. (2007). Exploring teachers' informal formative assessment practices and students' understanding in the context of scientific inquiry. Journal of research in science teaching, 44(1), 57-84.
Stoeger, H., & Ziegler, A. (2008). Evaluation of a classroom based training to improve self-regulation in time management tasks during homework activities with fourth graders. Metacognition and Learning, 3(3), 207-230.