Public Management: A New Public Service Oriented Concept of Public Service

Authors

  • Linh Benson Faculty of International Business and Economics, Vietnam National University
  • Huay Thúy Thanh Faculty of International Business and Economics, Vietnam National University, Vietnam
  • Bảo Nga Thao Faculty of International Business and Economics, Vietnam National University, Vietnam

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47616/jamrems.v2i3.124

Keywords:

Public service, Public Management, Public Administration

Abstract

This article discusses the application of the new public service concept in serving the public. This is based on the Public Administration Problem in its development which has gone through several stages. As one of the countries in the world, of course, it is part of the global administration system, which always develops in accordance with the development of contradictions and mutual relations between nations in the world. So that the implementation of the new public service can have an impact on the implementation of the New Public Service with an awareness of the real role of the state. It is no longer authoritarian or still chooses who has the right to receive services from the State. In the current context, the practice of Public Administration has led to the principles of the New Public Service paradigm.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Alston, P., & Heenan, J. (2003). Shrinking the international labor code: an unintended consequence of the 1998 ILO declaration on fundamental principles and rights at work. NYUJ Int'l. L. & Pol., 36, 221.

Brunnermeier, M., Crockett, A., Goodhart, C. A., Persaud, A., & Shin, H. S. (2009). The fundamental principles of financial regulation (Vol. 11). Geneva: ICMB, Internat. Center for Monetary and Banking Studies.

Delbridge, R., & Keenoy, T. (2010). Beyond managerialism?. The international journal of human resource management, 21(6), 799-817.

Duit, A. (2016). Resilience thinking: Lessons for public administration. Public Administration, 94(2), 364-380.

Eagleton-Pierce, M., & Knafo, S. (2020). Introduction: The political economy of managerialism. Review of International Political Economy, 27(4), 763-779.

Harlow, E. (2003). New managerialism, social service departments and social work practice today. Practice, 15(2), 29-44.

Jun, J. S. (2012). Social Construction of Public Administration, The: Interpretive and Critical Perspectives. SUNY Press.

Locke, R. R., & Spender, J. C. (2011). Confronting managerialism: How the business elite and their schools threw our lives out of balance. Zed Books Ltd..

Lynn Jr, L. E. (2001). The myth of the bureaucratic paradigm: What traditional public administration really stood for. Public Administration Review, 61(2), 144-160.

Overeem, P., & Tholen, B. (2011). After managerialism: MacIntyre’s lessons for the study of public administration. Administration & Society, 43(7), 722-748.

Raadschelders, J. C. (2011). The future of the study of public administration: Embedding research object and methodology in epistemology and ontology. Public Administration Review, 71(6), 916-924.

Sinclair, A. (1989). Public sector culture managerialism or multiculturalism?. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 48(4), 382-397.

Vo, D. H. (2010). The economics of fiscal decentralization. Journal of Economic Surveys, 24(4), 657-679.

Downloads

Published

2021-05-04

How to Cite

Benson, L., Thanh, H. T. ., & Thao, B. N. . (2021). Public Management: A New Public Service Oriented Concept of Public Service. Journal of Asian Multicultural Research for Economy and Management Study, 2(3), 29-36. https://doi.org/10.47616/jamrems.v2i3.124