The Meaning of Risk Communication Among Stakeholders: A Phenomenological Study of Slow-Onset Coastal Disasters through Mangrove Conservation
Keywords:
Risk Communication, Slow-Onset Disaster, Coastal Stakeholders, Phenomenology, Mangrove ConservationAbstract
This study aims to explore the meanings of risk communication constructed by stakeholders in responding to slow-onset disasters in the coastal areas of the North Coast of West Java through marine conservation initiatives in the form of mangrove planting. Gradual coastal abrasion has affected living spaces, livelihoods, and the sustainability of coastal environments; however, it has not been uniformly interpreted as a disaster by the actors involved. The study employs a qualitative approach using a phenomenological research design. Research informants include representatives from the North Coast Regional Office of Marine and Fisheries of West Java (CDKPWU), the Regional Forestry Office II (CDK Wil II), the Regional Disaster Management Agency (BPBD), coastal communities, experts, and community-based groups (Pokmas). Data were collected through in-depth interviews and observation and analyzed based on the subjective experiences and risk perceptions of each actor. The findings indicate that risk meanings vary and are influenced by the actors’ positions and roles. Government actors tend to interpret slow-onset disasters as issues of environmental management and long-term development, while coastal communities perceive them as direct threats to livelihoods and living spaces. Community-based groups view risk as an opportunity to strengthen collective, conservation-based action, whereas experts emphasize ecological vulnerability and long-term sustainability. These differences highlight the importance of contextual and adaptive risk communication in fostering shared perceptions and strengthening collective preparedness.
Downloads
References
Alam, A., Prodhan, M. E., Islam, F., Hasan, M. N., Chowdhury, M. A. B., & Uddin, M. J. (2025). The effects of household water, sanitation, and hygiene on early childhood education enrollment: evidence from the 2022 Bangladesh demographic and health survey. BMC Public Health, 25(1), 2732. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-025-23968-7
Alfarabi, A., & Adhrianti, L. (2023). Strategi Komunikasi Resiko Bencana Bagi Upaya Penanggulangan Bencana Daerah (Studi Pemetaan Resiko Bencana di Kabupaten Bengkulu Tengah). Ekspresi Dan Persepsi: Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi, 6(1), 146-158. https://doi.org/10.33822/jep.v6i1.5529
Aziz, M. H. (2023). Komunikasi kebencanaan: Peran dan manfaat pada mitigasi. Communications, 5(1), 301-316. https://doi.org/10.21009/communications.5.1.2
Bhokaleba, B. P., c, E. (2022). Persepsi Masyarakat Pesisir Utara Kabupaten Sikka Terhadap Fungsi Mangrove Sebagai Penahan Gelombang Tsunami. Papalele (Jurnal Penelitian Sosial Ekonomi Perikanan dan Kelautan), 6(2), 68-74. https://doi.org/10.30598/papalele.2022.6.2.68
Boyd, M., & Wilson, N. (2021). Anticipatory governance for preventing and mitigating catastrophic and existential risks. Policy Quarterly, 17(4), 20-31. https://doi.org/10.26686/pq.v17i4.7313
Comfort, L., & Chang, S. (2025). Transition in dynamic events: The 2020 lightning complex fires in Northern California as an adaptive system. Risk Analysis, 45(12), 4318-4331. https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.70015
Douglas, M., & Wildavsky, A. (1983). Risk and culture: An essay on the selection of technological and environmental dangers. London: Univ of California Press.
Fiona, D. Y. 2022. “Upaya Dinas Kelautan Dan Perikanan Dalam Konservasi Kelautan Di Wilayah Bintan Timur.” WEDANA: Jurnal Kajian Pemerintahan, Politik Dan Birokrasi 8 (2): 22–25. https://doi.org/10.25299/wedana.2022.vol8(2).10561
Hapsari, D. R. P., & Farabi, N. (2019). Peran negara donor dan organisasi internasional melalui inatews dalam disaster risk reduction di indonesia. Journal of International Relations Diponegoro, 6(1), 156-163. https://doi.org/10.14710/jirud.v6i1.26404
Hariani, R. R., Arisuma, N., & Saleh, A. (2024). Resilience of Natural Disaster Victims Based on Social Capital Community Recovery Strategy for Flash Floods in Ladang Rimba. Jurnal Penelitian Medan Agama, 15(1), 19-26. https://doi.org/10.58836/jpma.v15i1.20518
Haslinda, N. (2025). Kerentanan daerah pesisir akibat naiknya muka air laut (sea level rise) di Indonesia: Coastal and marine environmental disasters. Riset Sains dan Teknologi Kelautan, 44-51.
Khumairoh, D. F., Malau, C. N. B., & Doko, M. M. (2023). Perspektif Risiko Budaya Douglas
Terhadap Manajemen Risiko Rumah Sakit Pada Kebijakan Covid-19. TUTURAN: Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi, Sosial dan Humaniora, 1(2), 27-42. https://doi.org/10.47861/tuturan.v1i2.142
Mikoš, M. (2011). Public perception and stakeholder involvement in the crisis management of sediment‐related disasters and their mitigation: The case of the Stože debris flow in NW Slovenia. Integrated environmental assessment and management, 7(2), 216-227.
Monika, N. R., & Kusumawardhani, T. (2023). Peran Komunikasi Organisasi Dalam Meningkatkan Kinerja Karyawan Pt. Keihin Indonesia. INTERPRETASI: Communication & Public Relation, 3(2), 78-86. https://doi.org/10.53990/interpretasi.v3i2.248
Morgan, M. G., Florin, M. V., Linkov, I., Oye, K. A., Petersen, A. C., Renn, O., ... & Xue, L. (2025). The International Risk Governance Council: Reflections on a 20‐Year Experiment in Support of Improved Risk Governance. Risk Analysis, 45(11), 38603874. https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.70117
Mubarok, J. (2023). Paradigma Positivisme Dan Pospositivisme Dalam Kebaharuan Penelitian Arsitektur Dan Perkotaan. Jurnal Ilmiah Arsitektur, 13(1), 11-21. https://doi.org/10.32699/jiars.v13i1.3710
Nuriman, D. A., Lestari, P., Irwanti, M., & Sigit, R. (2022). Risk Communication Model in Facing Tsunami Disaster Through Stakeholder Engagement. Journal of Social Science, 3(6), 1247-1254. https://doi.org/10.46799/jss.v3i6.471
Okunola, O. H. (2024). Stakeholder engagement in disaster recovery: Insights into roles and power dynamics from the Ahr Valley, Germany. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 114, 104960. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2024.104960
Purnomo, S. (2022). Peranan penting komunikasi organisasi dalam membangun organisasi. ARKANA: Jurnal Komunikasi dan Media, 1 (01), 34–42.
Putra, W. B. T. S., & Ardianto, B. (2022). Why does risk communication matter? Preventive and excessive health behavior among uninfected people. South Asian Journal of Social Studies and Economics, 13(2), 56-72. https://doi.org/10.9734/SAJSSE/2022/v13i230355
Rabe, L., Sataøen, H. L., Lidskog, R., & Eriksson, M. (2024). Making risk communication in practice: dimensions of professional logics in risk and vulnerability assessments. Journal of risk research, 27(3), 389-403. https://doi.org/10.1080/13669877.2024.2328199
Rijali, A. (2018). Analisis data kualitatif. Alhadharah: Jurnal Ilmu Dakwah, 17(33), 81-95. https://doi.org/10.18592/alhadharah.v17i33.2374
Riyantie, M., & Barizki, R. N. (2020). Manajemen Komunikasi Teraupetik Pada Penyembuhan Pasien Skizofrenia. WACANA: Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Komunikasi, 19(2), 285-295. https://doi.org/10.32509/.v19i2.1160
Rusadi, S., Mulyawan, R., Suwaryo, U., & Yuningsih, N. Y. (2024). Implementing good environmental governance to manage coastal abrasion in bengkalis regency, indonesia. dalam Jurnal International Journal of Sustainable Development & Planning, 19(5), 1911-1919.
Ruslie, J. W., & Surya, R. (2021). Konservasi Terumbu Karang sebagai Upaya Menjaga
Ekosistem di Laut. Jurnal Sains, Teknologi, Urban, Perancangan, Arsitektur (Stupa), 3(2), 1681-1690. https://doi.org/10.24912/stupa.v3i2.12309
Sellnow‐Richmond, D. D., & Sellnow, T. L. (2020). The Consequences of Risk Amplification in the Evolution of Warning Messages during Slow‐Moving Crises: Hurricane Irma as a Case Study. The handbook of applied communication research, 443-456. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119399926.ch26
Sjöberg, L. (2020). Explaining risk perception: an empirical evaluation of cultural theory. In Risk management (pp. 127-144). London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429284243
Thomas, M., Klemm, C., Hutchins, B., & Kaufman, S. (2022). Unpacking the realities and complexities of sensemaking: Government practitioners’ experiences of emergency risk communication. Risk Analysis, 42(11), 2536-2549. https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.13828
w John, C., & J David, C. (2023). Research Design Qualitative, Quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data. https://doi.org/10.1002/nha3.20258
Wachinger, G., Renn, O., Begg, C., & Kuhlicke, C. (2013). The risk perception paradox— implications for governance and communication of natural hazards. Risk analysis, 33(6), 1049-1065. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2012.01942.x
Zajac, M., Kulawiak, C., Li, S., Erickson, C., Hubbell, N., & Gong, J. (2025). Unifying floodrisk communication: Empowering community leaders through AI-enhanced, contextualized storytelling. Hydrology, 12(8), 204. https://doi.org/10.3390/hydrology12080204
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Journal of Asian Multicultural Research for Social Sciences Study

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

























