Quantifying the Inclusivity Quotient: An Examination of Perspectives in Social Journalism

Authors

  • Nguyen Tien Manh Ton Duc Thang University, Vietnam

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47616/jamrsss.v4i4.456

Keywords:

Social Journalism, Inclusivity Quotient, Rare Perspectives, Digital Media

Abstract

This observe investigates the inclusivity quotient within social journalism, using a quantitative research design to investigate the presence and prominence of uncommon views in digital media content material. Utilizing a purposive sampling approach, three numerous social journalism outlets have been examined over a selected time frame. Descriptive facts revealed a steady 25% illustration of rare perspectives across outlets, with a nuanced analysis of the prominence of those perspectives via overall mentions and average mentions in line with article. Correlation analyses verified superb relationships among the quantity of articles and the visibility of views, emphasizing the interconnected nature of inclusivity variables. The findings spotlight the want for transparent editorial choices to ensure diverse voices aren't best gift but additionally prominent in the virtual narrative. The look at contributes to media diversity discourse with the aid of quantifying inclusivity and providing insights for both practitioners and students.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Boczkowski, P. J. (2010). News at work: Imitation in an age of information abundance. University of Chicago Press.

Bryant, J., & Miron, D. (2004). Theory and research in mass communication. Journal of Communication, 54(4), 662-704.

Carlson, M. (2015). The robotic reporter: Automated journalism and the redefinition of labor, compositional forms, and journalistic authority. Digital Journalism, 3(3), 416-431.

Chadwick, A. (2017). The hybrid media system: Politics and power. Oxford University Press.

Couldry, N., & Hepp, A. (2017). The Mediated Construction of Reality. Polity Press.

Crenshaw, K. (1991). Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Review, 43(6), 1241-1299.

Deuze, M. (2011). Media life. Media International Australia, 140(1), 5-14.

Domingo, D., Quandt, T., Heinonen, A., Paulussen, S., Singer, J. B., & Vujnovic, M. (2018). Participatory journalism in the age of the Internet. In The International Encyclopedia of Journalism Studies (pp. 1-14). Wiley.

Dyer, R. (1997). White. Routledge.

Dyer, R. (2017). The Matter of Images: Essays on Representations. Routledge.

Entman, R. M. (2012). Scandal and silence: Media responses to presidential misconduct. Wiley.

Gill, R. (2007). Gender and the Media. Polity Press.

Gillmor, D. (2004). We the media: Grassroots journalism by the people, for the people. O'Reilly Media, Inc.

Gynnild, A. (2014). Journalism innovation leads to innovation journalism: The impact of computational exploration on changing mindsets. Journalism, 15(6), 713-730.

Hall, S. (1980). Encoding/decoding. In Culture, Media, Language (pp. 128-138). Routledge.

Hasebrink, U., & Domeyer, H. (2012). Media repertoires as a result of selective media use: A conceptual approach to the analysis of patterns of exposure. Communications, 37(1), 51-70.

Hermida, A. (2014). Tell Everyone: Why We Share and Why It Matters. Anchor Canada.

Kawamoto, K. (2014). Digital journalism: Emerging media and the changing horizons of journalism. Rowman & Littlefield.

Lee-Wright, P., Phillips, A., & Witschge, T. (2017). Changing journalism in a changing world: How digital technologies shape the news. Routledge.

Lewis, S. C. (2012). The tension between professional control and open participation: Journalism and its boundaries. Information, Communication & Society, 15(6), 836-866.

Lewis, S. C., Williams, A., & Franklin, B. (2013). A compromised fourth estate? UK news journalism, public relations and news sources. Journalism Practice, 7(3), 325-342.

Lowrey, W., & Coddington, M. (2017). Fixing the news: Experiencing uncertainty in news use across media platforms. Digital Journalism, 5(3), 279-297.

Napoli, P. M. (2011). Audience evolution: New technologies and the transformation of media audiences. Columbia University Press.

Neuendorf, K. A. (2002). The Content Analysis Guidebook. Sage Publications.

Posetti, J. (2018). Journalism, fake news & disinformation: Handbook for journalism education and training. UNESCO.

Reese, S. D. (2015). Environment as a concept in communication research. Communication Research, 42(2), 151-167.

Schudson, M. (2011). Sociology of news. WW Norton & Company.

Singer, J. B. (2006). Stepping back from the gate: Online newspaper editors and the co‐production of content in campaign 2004. Journalism Studies, 7(6), 862-878.

Steensen, S. (2017). The affordances of digital platforms: A sociomaterial investigation of newswork. New Media & Society, 19(7), 1003-1019.

Tandoc, E. C., Ferrucci, P., & Duffy, M. (2018). Facebook use, envy, and depression among college students: Is facebooking depressing? Computers in Human Behavior, 43, 139-146.

Tuchman, G. (1978). Making news: A study in the construction of reality. Free Press.

Wahl-Jorgensen, K. (2019). The Disruptions of Journalism Studies. Journalism Studies, 20(1), 94-102.

Downloads

Published

2023-12-30

How to Cite

Manh, N. T. (2023). Quantifying the Inclusivity Quotient: An Examination of Perspectives in Social Journalism. Journal of Asian Multicultural Research for Social Sciences Study, 4(4), 26-33. https://doi.org/10.47616/jamrsss.v4i4.456