The Effectiveness of an Integrated Law Enforcement Center (GAKKUMDU) Policy on Handling 2019 Election Criminal Violations in North Sulawesi
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47616/jamrsss.v4i2.392Keywords:
Effectiveness, Election, GakkumduAbstract
In handling election criminal violations, the policies of the Election Law Enforcement Center or Gakumdu are regulated. Gakumdu consists of elements from Bawaslu, the prosecutor's office and the police. The aim of the establishment of Gakumdu is to encourage the election trial to take place quickly and accurately. This must be done because the election process is bound by a strict schedule and stages, so it is impossible for the election stages to be adjusted to the ordinary judicial process. This study aims to analyze whether the Sentra Gakkumdu Policy in North Sulawesi has had an impact on the effectiveness of election law enforcement in Indonesia. What are the obstacles to the Gakkumdu Sentra Policy in the electoral law enforcement process in Indonesia and what solutions can be made so that the role of the Gakkumdu Sentra Policy is more effective in enforcing election law. The results of the analysis concluded that the handling of alleged violations of election crimes by the Sentra Gakkumdu in the 2019 election in Sulawesi was not effective because there were provisions both in the election law and other regulations that hindered the work of the Sentra Gakkumdu. There are often differences in legal perceptions among members of the Gakkumdu in determining whether a request fulfills the element of a violation or not. Not all districts/cities have a Prosecutor's Office or a Police Office.
Downloads
References
Dunn, W. N. (2015). Public policy analysis. routledge.
Hewison, K. (2015). Thailand: Contestation over elections, sovereignty and representation. Representation, 51(1), 51-62.
Rosalina, I. (2014). efektivitas program nasional pemberdayaan masyarakat mandiri Perkotaan pada kelompok pinjaman bergulir di dsa mantren kecamatan Karangrejo kabupaten magetaan. Publika, 2(2).
Krivonosova, I., & Serrano-Iova, R. A. (2021). From the Parliament to a Polling Station: How to Make Electoral Laws More Comprehensible to Election Administrators. Election Law Journal: Rules, Politics, and Policy, 20(4), 364-381.
Muhadjir, N. (2000). Ilmu pendidikan dan perubahan sosial. Yogyakarta: Rake Sarasin.
Noeng, M. (2000). Teori Pendidikan Pelaku Sosial Kreatif. Yogyakarta: Raka Sarasin.
Porter, L. W., & Steers, R. M. (1973). Organizational, work, and personal factors in employee turnover and absenteeism. Psychological bulletin, 80(2).
Soekanto. S. (1987). Faktor-faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Penegakan Hukum. Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada.
Van Spanje, J. (2010). Parties beyond the pale: Why some political parties are ostracized by their competitors while others are not. Comparative European Politics, 8, 354-383.
William, D. (1994). Public policy analysis: An introduction. Pittsburg University, Prentice Hall, Englewod Cliffs. EU, 143-144.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Journal of Asian Multicultural Research for Social Sciences Study
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.