Teacher Professional Development: Strategies for Cultivating Effective and Adaptable Educators
Main Article Content
Abstract
This look at investigates the impact of a centered professional improvement software on the job delight of educators, reading facts from 300 contributors. Descriptive records monitor a median activity delight rating of 3.85, indicating a typically positive outlook among members. The low fashionable deviation suggests a consensus, highlighting the program's effectiveness in developing a constant and positive experience for educators. Demographic evaluation shows a reasonably various age range and a notably homogeneous stage of teaching enjoy. Collaborative gaining knowledge of communities, a key software factor, possibly contributed to the effective outcomes. While the findings are promising, obstacles encompass a slender age variety and a want for a extra specific exploration of program additives. This study aligns with existing literature, emphasizing the importance of complete expert development in enhancing instructor pleasure and efficacy. The high-quality results underscore the importance of investing in targeted and collaborative development tasks, with capacity implications for coaching practices and pupil outcomes. Future research have to discover lengthy-term outcomes and hire qualitative methodologies for a nuanced understanding of educators' experiences. This have a look at contributes treasured insights to the discourse on powerful instructor development, guiding the implementation of impactful tasks within the evolving landscape of training.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
References
Burić, I., & Moe, A. (2020). What makes teachers enthusiastic: The interplay of positive affect, self-efficacy and job satisfaction. Teaching and teacher education, 89, 103008.
Kimmons, R., Graham, C. R., & West, R. E. (2020). The PICRAT model for technology integration in teacher preparation. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 20(1), 176-198.
Lan, T., Chen, M., Zeng, X., & Liu, T. (2020). The influence of job and individual resources on work engagement among Chinese police officers: a moderated mediation model. Frontiers in psychology, 11, 497.
Moore, R. L. (2020). Developing lifelong learning with heutagogy: contexts, critiques, and challenges. Distance Education, 41(3), 381-401.
Muñoz-Carril, P. C., Hernández-Sellés, N., Fuentes-Abeledo, E. J., & González-Sanmamed, M. (2021). Factors influencing students’ perceived impact of learning and satisfaction in Computer Supported Collaborative Learning. Computers & Education, 174, 104310.
Nesje, K., & Lejonberg, E. (2022). Tools for the school-based mentoring of pre-service teachers: A scoping review. Teaching and teacher education, 111, 103609.
Nguyen, T. N., Abdalkader, M., Nagel, S., Qureshi, M. M., Ribo, M., Caparros, F., ... & Nogueira, R. G. (2022). Noncontrast computed tomography vs computed tomography perfusion or magnetic resonance imaging selection in late presentation of stroke with large-vessel occlusion. JAMA neurology, 79(1), 22-31.
Sancar, R., Atal, D., & Deryakulu, D. (2021). A new framework for teachers’ professional development. Teaching and Teacher Education, 101, 103305.
Smith, C., & Gillespie, M. (2023). Research on professional development and teacher change: Implications for adult basic education. In Review of Adult Learning and Literacy, Volume 7 (pp. 205-244). Routledge.