Institutional Development in Public Transport Policy: A Literature Review

Authors

  • Kwan Hue Thuang Mawlamyine University, Myanmar

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47616/jamrsss.v1i2.31

Keywords:

Institutional Development, Policy, Transportation

Abstract

This article discusses institutional development in public transport policy in terms of concepts and theories. The institutionalized organization must establish and maintain a network in its environment to keep it alive and functioning, by adjusting to the relationships in an organization's life. The development of the transportation system is carried out in a sustainable, consistent, and integrated manner, both inter and between modes, with other development sectors and taking into account the existence of the local government. The policies formulated by the city government should take into account all available modes of public transportation and may be utilized by the city community. The design of vehicles that will be used as public transportation must also be adapted to the needs of the community and conditions in urban areas.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Acharya, A. (1997). Ideas, identity, and institution‐building: From the ‘ASEAN way’to the ‘Asia‐Pacific way'?. The Pacific Review, 10(3), 319-346.

Esman, M. J. (1986). Diasporas and international relations. Modern diasporas in international politics, 333-349.

Esman, M. J. (1988). The maturing of development administration. Public Administration and Development, 8(2), 125-134.

Fogel, D. S., & Madhavan, R. (1994). Strategic types in institution building: A fit perspective. Knowledge and Policy, 7(3), 19-30.

Goldsmith, A. A. (1992). Institutions and planned socioeconomic change: Four approaches. Public Administration Review, 582-587.

Jeon, M. C., & Amekudzi, A. (2005). Addressing sustainability in transportation systems: definitions, indicators, and metrics. Journal of infrastructure systems, 11(1), 31-50.

John, M. C. (1999). Leadership style, school climate, and the institutional commitment of teachers. In International Forum Journal (Vol. 2, No. 1, pp. 25-57).

Johnston, R. (2004). The urban transportation planning process. The geography of urban transportation, 3, 115-140.

Post, J., & Preston, L. E. (2012). Private management and public policy: The principle of public responsibility. Stanford University Press.

Rudzki, R. E. (1995). The application of a strategic management model to the internationalization of higher education institutions. Higher Education, 29(4), 421-441.

Smith-Doerr, L. (2005). Institutionalizing the network form: How life scientists legitimate work in the biotechnology industry. In Sociological Forum (Vol. 20, No. 2, pp. 271-299). Kluwer Academic Publishers-Plenum Publishers.

Spaargaren, G., & Mol, A. P. (1992). Sociology, environment, and modernity: Ecological modernization as a theory of social change. Society & natural resources, 5(4), 323-344.

Uphoff, N. (1986). Local institutional development: an analytical sourcebook with cases. Kumarian Press.

White, S. P. (1995). Multiphase nonisothermal transport of systems of reacting chemicals. Water Resources Research, 31(7), 1761-1772.

Downloads

Published

2020-10-01

How to Cite

Thuang, K. H. . (2020). Institutional Development in Public Transport Policy: A Literature Review. Journal of Asian Multicultural Research for Social Sciences Study, 1(2), 18-24. https://doi.org/10.47616/jamrsss.v1i2.31