The interaction model of the Regional People's Representative Council and local governments regarding timely approval of the Regional Budget

Authors

  • Baharuddin Andang Doctoral Candidate in Public Administration, State University of Makassar, Indonesia
  • Amir Imbaruddin Co-Promoter Professor of Public Administration State University of Makassar, Indonesia
  • Hamsu Abdul Gani Co-Promoter Professor of Public Administration State University of Makassar, Indonesia
  • Muchlis Madani Co-Promoter Professor of Public Administration State University of Makassar, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47616/jamrsss.v2i1.78

Keywords:

Interaction model, Regional People's Representative Council, Budget

Abstract

This study aims to describe the interaction model of the Regional People's Representative Council and the regional government of Sidenreng Rappang Regency regarding the timely ratification of the Regional Budget (APBD). The method in this research is descriptive with a qualitative approach. The total number of informants was 16 (sixteen) people. Data / information is collected through interview techniques equipped with observation techniques. The data collected were analyzed using qualitative analysis techniques, namely interactive analysis models, then the results of the analysis were presented in narrative form. The result of the research shows that the interaction in the policy context involves various elements and elites who interact with each other, but the phenomenon that occurs is sometimes contravention which often occurs in the midst of elite interaction. The interaction takes place in the form of bargaining after there is a difference in perceptions of a number of program and activity nomenclature along with the nominal value stated in the draft. The interactions that occur between the actors of the Regional People's Representative Council (DPRD) and the Regional Government since the preparation of the General Budget Policy - Temporary Budget Ceiling Priority (KUA-PPAS) to the determination of the APBD, have always been colored by dissociative, associative forms of interaction but finally resolved with a local wisdom approach.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Birkland, T. A. (2007). Agenda setting in public policy. Handbook of public policy analysis: Theory, politics, and methods, 125, 63-78.

Chong, D. (2000). Rational lives: Norms and values in politics and society. University of Chicago Press.

Dalling, B. (2002). Administrative Wilderness: Protecting Our National Forestlands in Contravention of Congressional Intent and Public Policy. Nat. Resources J., 42, 385.

de Sardan, J. P. (2015). Practical norms: informal regulations within public bureaucracies (in Africa and beyond). Real governance and practical norms in Sub-Saharan Africa. London: Routledge.

Eissler, R., Russell, A., & Jones, B. D. (2014). New avenues for the study of agenda setting. Policy Studies Journal, 42, S71-S86.

Hall, C. M. (1999). Rethinking collaboration and partnership: A public policy perspective. Journal of sustainable tourism, 7(3-4), 274-289.

Keltner, D., Van Kleef, G. A., Chen, S., & Kraus, M. W. (2008). A reciprocal influence model of social power: Emerging principles and lines of inquiry. Advances in experimental social psychology, 40, 151-192.

Lawn, M., & Lingard, B. (2002). Constructing a European policy space in educational governance: The role of transnational policy actors. European Educational Research Journal, 1(2), 290-307.

Liu, X., Lindquist, E., Vedlitz, A., & Vincent, K. (2010). Understanding local policymaking: Policy elites' perceptions of local agenda setting and alternative policy selection. Policy Studies Journal, 38(1), 69-91.

Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldana, J. (2014). Fundamentals of qualitative data analysis. Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook, 69-104.

Nahuis, R., Moors, E. H., & Smits, R. E. (2012). User producer interaction in context. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 79(6), 1121-1134.

Nurmandi, A., & Kim, S. (2015). Making e-procurement work in a decentralized procurement system: A comparison of three Indonesian cities. International Journal of Public Sector Management.

Schwartz, S. H. (1999). A theory of cultural values and some implications for work. Applied psychology, 48(1), 23-47.

Walton, R. E., & McKersie, R. B. (1991). A behavioral theory of labor negotiations: An analysis of a social interaction system. Cornell University Press.

Downloads

Published

2021-02-02

How to Cite

Andang, B. ., Imbaruddin, A. ., Gani, H. A. ., & Madani, M. . . (2021). The interaction model of the Regional People’s Representative Council and local governments regarding timely approval of the Regional Budget . Journal of Asian Multicultural Research for Social Sciences Study, 2(1), 7-15. https://doi.org/10.47616/jamrsss.v2i1.78