Fasting Gastric Acidity Evidential Effect on Esophageal Mucosal Damage

Main Article Content

Achnes Pangaribuan
Iga Suryadarma
Wira Gotera

Abstract

Gastric substances that potentially increase the esophageal mucosal damage are: gastric acid, pepsin, bile salts, and pancreatic enzymes. From all of these substances, the highest potential for reflux damage is gastric acid. Although the main cause of clinical symptoms of GERD is acid reflux, it has been known that there are subgroups with typical reflux symptoms that do not provide sufficient response or not responsive to PPI treatment. Despite the improvement of esophagitis, there is no clinical improvements in reflux symptoms of 30% respondents. Therefore, this study was designed to determine fasting gastric acidity with endoscopic findings in patients with GERD. A comparative-analysis study, which determine the fasting gastric acidity from endoscopic findings in patients with GERD. Samples recruited using consecutives sampling technique and divided into groups of esophagitis and non-esophagitis reflux. A total of 40 samples involved in this study. The Mann-Whitney test, was used for analyzing the difference between fasting gastric acidity from endoscopic findings of esophagitis lesions in patient with GERD. The median value for fasting gastric acidity in the esophagitis reflux group was 1.88 (0.82-4.84), whereas the median value for fasting gastric acidity in the non-esophagitis reflux group was 2.49 (0.68-5.97). The Mann-Whitney test result was p=0.298 (p>0.05). This study shows that there is no significant difference of fasting gastric acidity from endoscopic findings between esophagitis and non esophagitis reflux groups in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). This study shows that esophagitis lesions are not affected by gastric acidity.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Pangaribuan, A. ., Suryadarma, I. ., & Gotera, W. . (2021). Fasting Gastric Acidity Evidential Effect on Esophageal Mucosal Damage. Journal of Asian Multicultural Research for Medical and Health Science Study, 2(2), 17-21. https://doi.org/10.47616/jamrmhss.v2i2.97
Section
Articles

References

Ayazi, S., Leers, J. M., Oezcelik, A., Abate, E., Peyre, C. G., Hagen, J. A., ... & Crookes, P. F. (2009). Measurement of gastric pH in ambulatory esophageal pH monitoring. Surgical endoscopy, 23(9), 1968-1973.

Sifrim, D., & Zerbib, F. (2012). Diagnosis and management of patients with reflux symptoms refractory to proton pump inhibitors. Gut, 61(9), 1340-1354.

Richter, J. E. (2009). Role of the gastric refluxate in gastroesophageal reflux disease: acid, weak acid and bile. The American journal of the medical sciences, 338(2), 89-95.

Boeckxstaens, G. E., & Smout, A. (2010). Systematic review: role of acid, weakly acidic and weakly alkaline reflux in gastro‐oesophageal reflux disease. Alimentary pharmacology & therapeutics, 32(3), 334-343.

Bredenoord, A. J., Weusten, B. L., Curvers, W. L., Timmer, R., & Smout, A. J. (2006). Determinants of perception of heartburn and regurgitation. Gut, 55(3), 313-318.

Hirschowitz, B. I. (1991). A critical analysis, with appropriate controls, of gastric acid and pepsin secretion in clinical esophagitis. Gastroenterology, 101(5), 1149-1158.

Zhu, H. M., Huang, X., Deng, C. Z., Porro, G. P., Pace, F., & Sangaletti, O. (1998). Pathogenetic factors affecting gastroesophageal reflux in patients with esophagitis and concomitant duodenal ulcer: a multivariate analysis. World journal of gastroenterology, 4(2), 153.

Tack, J., & Pandolfino, J. E. (2018). Pathophysiology of gastroesophageal reflux disease. Gastroenterology, 154(2), 277-288.

Patrick, L. (2011). Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD): a review of conventional and alternative treatments. Alternative Medicine Review, 16(2).

Oh, T. Y., Lee, J. S., Ahn, B. O., Cho, H., Kim, W. B., Kim, Y. B., ... & Hahm, K. B. (2001). Oxidative stress is more important than acid in the pathogenesis of reflux oesophagitis in rats. Gut, 49(3), 364-371.