Global Economic Policy Response in Asean Welcomes Changes in Market Behavior Towards the New Normal

Authors

  • Linh Benson Faculty of International Business and Economics, Vietnam National University, Vietnam
  • Ha Dai Sinh Faculty of International Business and Economics, Vietnam National University, Vietnam

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47616/jamrems.v2i2.109

Keywords:

Global Economy, Market Behavior, GDP

Abstract

This article addresses the Gross Domestic Product (GDP) growth rate, normally used to determine how quickly economic growth has contracted in a region, i.e. adverse growth. Thus, the Finance Ministers and the ASEAN Central Bank Governors have decided on a number of promises, including (1) that exceptional policy responses to resolve this pandemic would be washed away to restore economic activity. (2) to enhance the economic and financial monitoring efficiency of the area, and to promote readiness to act as an efficient financial safety net in the region and as an essential component of the global financial security net of the Chiang May Initiative Multilateralization (CMIM). (3) to facilitate greater intra-ASEAN exchange and investment by setting up eligible ASEAN banks (4) funding for local currency use programs for settlements, foreign investments and other operations between ASEAN countries, such as revenue and transfer transactions. (5) supports the advancement of partnership in the area of the funding of infrastructures, in the context of many recommendations to facilitate private investment growth, among other steps. (6) to promote initiatives to use digital financial services to enhance the financial inclusion of the area and to enhance cooperation on various cyber risk management material.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Adeel-Farooq, R. M., Raji, J. O., & Adeleye, B. N. (2020). Economic growth and methane emission: testing the EKC hypothesis in ASEAN economies. Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal.

Bhattacharyay, B. N. (2009). Infrastructure development for ASEAN economic integration.

Carayannis, E., & Sipp, C. (2005). E-development toward the knowledge economy: leveraging technology, innovation and entrepreneurship for" smart" development. Springer.

Chandra, A. C., Mujahid, I., & Mahyassari, R. K. (2020). Trade Measures in the Time of COVID-19: The Case of ASEAN. ASEAN Policy Brief, 3, 1-12.

Li, K., Kim, D. J., Lang, K. R., Kauffman, R. J., & Naldi, M. (2020). How should we understand the digital economy in Asia? Critical assessment and research agenda. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 44, 101004.

Lucas Jr, R. E. (1986). Principles of fiscal and monetary policy. Journal of Monetary Economics, 17(1), 117-134.

McKibbin, W., & Vines, D. (2020). Global macroeconomic cooperation in response to the COVID-19 pandemic: a roadmap for the G20 and the IMF. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 36(Supplement_1), S297-S337.

Mohamed, H., & Ali, H. (2018). Blockchain, Fintech, and Islamic finance: Building the future in the new Islamic digital economy. Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co KG.

Rodrik, D. (2008). The real exchange rate and economic growth. Brookings papers on economic activity, 2008(2), 365-412.

Weidenbaum, M. L., & Hughes, S. (1996). The bamboo network: How expatriate Chinese entrepreneurs are creating a new economic superpower in Asia. Simon and Schuster.

Downloads

Published

2021-03-31

How to Cite

Benson, L. ., & Sinh, H. D. . (2021). Global Economic Policy Response in Asean Welcomes Changes in Market Behavior Towards the New Normal. Journal of Asian Multicultural Research for Economy and Management Study, 2(2), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.47616/jamrems.v2i2.109